Approved

OGC Standard

OGC MetOcean Application profile for WCS2.1: Part 2 MetOcean GetPolygon Extension
Peter Trevelyan Editor Paul Hershberg Editor Steve Olson Editor
Version: 1.0
Additional Formats: XML PDF DOC
OGC Standard

Approved

Document number:17-086r3
Document type:OGC Standard
Document subtype:Implementation
Document stage:Approved
Document language:English

 


License Agreement

Permission is hereby granted by the Open Geospatial Consortium, (“Licensor”), free of charge and subject to the terms set forth below, to any person obtaining a copy of this Intellectual Property and any associated documentation, to deal in the Intellectual Property without restriction (except as set forth below), including without limitation the rights to implement, use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, and/or sublicense copies of the Intellectual Property, and to permit persons to whom the Intellectual Property is furnished to do so, provided that all copyright notices on the intellectual property are retained intact and that each person to whom the Intellectual Property is furnished agrees to the terms of this Agreement.

If you modify the Intellectual Property, all copies of the modified Intellectual Property must include, in addition to the above copyright notice, a notice that the Intellectual Property includes modifications that have not been approved or adopted by LICENSOR.

THIS LICENSE IS A COPYRIGHT LICENSE ONLY, AND DOES NOT CONVEY ANY RIGHTS UNDER ANY PATENTS THAT MAY BE IN FORCE ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD. THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY IS PROVIDED “AS IS”, WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, AND NONINFRINGEMENT OF THIRD PARTY RIGHTS. THE COPYRIGHT HOLDER OR HOLDERS INCLUDED IN THIS NOTICE DO NOT WARRANT THAT THE FUNCTIONS CONTAINED IN THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY WILL MEET YOUR REQUIREMENTS OR THAT THE OPERATION OF THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR ERROR FREE. ANY USE OF THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SHALL BE MADE ENTIRELY AT THE USER’S OWN RISK. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT HOLDER OR ANY CONTRIBUTOR OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS TO THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, OR ANY DIRECT, SPECIAL, INDIRECT OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, OR ANY DAMAGES WHATSOEVER RESULTING FROM ANY ALLEGED INFRINGEMENT OR ANY LOSS OF USE, DATA OR PROFITS, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE OR UNDER ANY OTHER LEGAL THEORY, ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE IMPLEMENTATION, USE, COMMERCIALIZATION OR PERFORMANCE OF THIS INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY.

This license is effective until terminated. You may terminate it at any time by destroying the Intellectual Property together with all copies in any form. The license will also terminate if you fail to comply with any term or condition of this Agreement. Except as provided in the following sentence, no such termination of this license shall require the termination of any third party end-user sublicense to the Intellectual Property which is in force as of the date of notice of such termination. In addition, should the Intellectual Property, or the operation of the Intellectual Property, infringe, or in LICENSOR’s sole opinion be likely to infringe, any patent, copyright, trademark or other right of a third party, you agree that LICENSOR, in its sole discretion, may terminate this license without any compensation or liability to you, your licensees or any other party. You agree upon termination of any kind to destroy or cause to be destroyed the Intellectual Property together with all copies in any form, whether held by you or by any third party.

Except as contained in this notice, the name of LICENSOR or of any other holder of a copyright in all or part of the Intellectual Property shall not be used in advertising or otherwise to promote the sale, use or other dealings in this Intellectual Property without prior written authorization of LICENSOR or such copyright holder. LICENSOR is and shall at all times be the sole entity that may authorize you or any third party to use certification marks, trademarks or other special designations to indicate compliance with any LICENSOR standards or specifications. This Agreement is governed by the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. The application to this Agreement of the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods is hereby expressly excluded. In the event any provision of this Agreement shall be deemed unenforceable, void or invalid, such provision shall be modified so as to make it valid and enforceable, and as so modified the entire Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. No decision, action or inaction by LICENSOR shall be construed to be a waiver of any rights or remedies available to it.

None of the Intellectual Property or underlying information or technology may be downloaded or otherwise exported or reexported in violation of U.S. export laws and regulations. In addition, you are responsible for complying with any local laws in your jurisdiction which may impact your right to import, export or use the Intellectual Property, and you represent that you have complied with any regulations or registration procedures required by applicable law to make this license enforceable.

Suggested additions, changes and comments on this standard are welcome and encouraged. Such suggestions may be submitted using the online change request form on OGC web site: http://portal.opengeospatial.org/public_ogc/change_request.php

 



I.  Abstract

This document defines an extension to WCS2.1, namely the extraction of data contained within a polygon defined either by a set of points or the radius and position of a circle point consisting of an information model and an XML encoding for the following two operations:

  1. GetCapabilities — a WCS function that describes the services and operations via a GetCapabilities document.

  2. GetPolygon — a WCS function that supports this operation to extract data from a multidimensional cube that lie within a polygon.

Metadata and vocabularies are defined that provide interoperability of these operations and documents using common semantics. The information model proposed supports MetOcean specific concepts and its user community, but these constructs may be useful and applicable to other communities.

II.  Keywords

The following are keywords to be used by search engines and document catalogues.

ogcdoc, OGC document, WCS, coverage, meteorology, oceanography, NWP, analysis, polygon observation, measurement, simulation, O&M and MetOcean


III.  Preface

Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject of patent rights. The Open Geospatial Consortium shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights.

Recipients of this document are requested to submit, with their comments, notification of any relevant patent claims or other intellectual property rights of which they may be aware that might be infringed by any implementation of the standard set forth in this document, and to provide supporting documentation.

IV.  Security Considerations

No security considerations have been made for this standard.

V.  Submitting Organizations

The following organizations submitted this Document to the Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC):

VI.  Submitters

All questions regarding this submission should be directed to the editor or the submitters:

Name Affiliation
Peter Trevelyan Met Office, UK
Paul Hershberg

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

National Weather Service (NWS)

Steve Olson

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

National Weather Service (NWS)

OGC MetOcean Application profile for WCS2.1: Part 2 MetOcean GetPolygon Extension

1.  Scope

The purpose of the GetPolygon operation is to extract data contained within a polygon defined either by a set of points or the radius and position of a circle point. The need for the GetPolygon operation stems from active members of the OGC MetOcean Domain Working Group (DWG) who saw a manifest need for extraction of such information from gridded datasets.

This work has been done by members of the OGC MetOcean Domain Working Group.

2.  Conformance

This standard defines:

Conformance with this standard shall be checked using all the relevant tests specified in Annex A (normative) of this document. The framework, concepts, and methodology for testing, and the criteria to be achieved to claim conformance are specified in the OGC Compliance Testing Policies and Procedures and the OGC Compliance Testing web site[multiblock footnote omitted].

In order to conform to this OGC™ interface standard, a software implementation shall choose to implement:

Any one of the conformance levels specified in Annex A (normative).

All requirements-classes and conformance-classes described in this document are owned by the standard(s) identified.

Requirements and conformance test URIs defined in this document are relative to: http://www.opengis.net/spec/WCS_application-profile_metocean_polygon/1.0/

This document establishes the following requirements and conformance classes:-

GetPolygon of URI http://www.opengis.net/spec/WCS_application-profile_metocean_polygon/1.0/req/getPolygon getPolygon at a conceptual level in clause 8.1

The corresponding conformance class is getPolygon with URI http://www.opengis.net/spec/WCS_application-profile_metocean_polygon/1.0/conf/getPolygon See A.1

PolygonDescriptionRing of http://www.opengis.net/spec/WCS_application-profile_metocean_polygon/1.0/req/getPolygon/PolygonDescriptionRing defining the PolygonRing at a conceptual level in clause 8.2

The corresponding conformance class is PolygonDescriptionRing with URI http://www.opengis.net/spec/WCS_application-profile_metocean_polygon/1.0/conf/getPolygon/PolygonDescriptionRing. See A.2

PolygonDescriptionCircle of http://www.opengis.net/spec/WCS_application-profile_metocean_polygon/1.0/req/getPolygon/PolygonDescriptionCircle defining the PolygonCircle at a conceptual level in clause 8.3

The corresponding conformance class is PolygonDescription with URI http://www.opengis.net/spec/WCS_application-profile_metocean_polygon/1.0/conf/getPolygon/PolygonDescriptionCircle. See A.3

SubsetByTrim of http://www.opengis.net/spec/WCS_application-profile_metocean_polygon/1.0/req/getPolygon/SubsetByTrim defining the VerticalTemporalDescription at a conceptual level in clause 8.4

The corresponding conformance class is VerticalTemporalDescription with URI http://www.opengis.net/spec/WCS_application-profile_metocean_polygon/1.0/conf/getPolygon/SubsetByTrim. See A.4

SubsetByInterpolation of http://www.opengis.net/spec/WCS_application-profile_metocean_polygon/1.0/req/getPolygon/SubsetByInterpolation defining the VerticalTemporalDescription at a conceptual level in clause 8.5

The corresponding conformance class is VerticalTemporalDescription with URI http://www.opengis.net/spec/WCS_application-profile_metocean_polygon/1.0/conf/getPolygon/SubsetByInterpolation. See A.5

GetPolygon-post-xml of http://www.opengis.net/spec/WCS_application-profile_metocean/1.0/req/getPolygon-post-xml defining the VerticalTemporalDescription at a conceptual level in clause 8.6

The corresponding conformance class is VerticalTemporalDescription with URI http://www.opengis.net/spec/WCS_application-profile_metocean/1.0/conf/getPolygon-post-xml seeA.6

3.  Normative references

The following documents are referred to in the text in such a way that some or all of their content constitutes requirements of this document. For dated references, only the edition cited applies. For undated references, the latest edition of the referenced document (including any amendments) applies.

Policy SWG: OGC 08-131r3, The Specification Model — Standard for Modular specifications. Open Geospatial Consortium (2009). https://portal.ogc.org/files/?artifact_id=34762&version=2

ISO: ISO/TS 19103:2005, Geographic information — Conceptual schema language. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva (2005). https://www.iso.org/standard/37800.html

ISO: ISO 8601:2004, Data elements and interchange formats — Information interchange — Representation of dates and times. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva (2004). https://www.iso.org/standard/40874.html

ISO: ISO 19107:2019, Geographic information — Spatial schema. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva (2019). https://www.iso.org/standard/66175.html

ISO: ISO 19111:2007, Geographic information — Spatial referencing by coordinates. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva (2007). https://www.iso.org/standard/41126.html

ISO: ISO 19123:2005, Geographic information — Schema for coverage geometry and functions. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva (2005). https://www.iso.org/standard/40121.html

ISO: ISO 19115-1:2014, Geographic information — Metadata — Part 1: Fundamentals. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva (2014). https://www.iso.org/standard/53798.html

ISO: ISO 19156:2011, Geographic information — Observations and measurements. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva (2011). https://www.iso.org/standard/32574.html

ISO: ISO 19136:2007, Geographic information — Geography Markup Language (GML). International Organization for Standardization, Geneva (2007). https://www.iso.org/standard/32554.html

Peter Baumann: OGC 17-089r1, OGC Web Coverage Service (WCS) 2.1 Interface Standard — Core. Open Geospatial Consortium (2018). http://docs.opengeospatial.org/is/17-089r1/17-089r1.html

Marie-Françoise Voidrot-Martinez, Chris Little, Jürgen Seib, Roy Ladner, Adrian Custer, Jeff de La B: OGC 12-111r1, OGC Best Practice for using Web Map Services (WMS) with Time-Dependent or Elevation-Dependent Data. Open Geospatial Consortium (2014). https://portal.ogc.org/files/?artifact_id=56394

Simon Cox: OGC 10-025r1, Observations and Measurements — XML Implementation. Open Geospatial Consortium (2011). https://portal.ogc.org/files/?artifact_id=41510

Alexandre Robin: OGC 08-094r1, OGC® SWE Common Data Model Encoding Standard. Open Geospatial Consortium (2011). https://portal.ogc.org/files/?artifact_id=41157

Peter Baumann, Eric Hirschorn, Joan Masó: OGC 09-146r8, OGC Coverage Implementation Schema with Corrigendum. Open Geospatial Consortium (2019). http://docs.opengeospatial.org/is/09-146r8/09-146r8.html

Arliss Whiteside Jim Greenwood : OGC 06-121r9, OGC Web Service Common Implementation Specification. Open Geospatial Consortium (2010). https://portal.ogc.org/files/?artifact_id=38867

UCUM: Unified Code for Units of Measure (UCUM) – Version 1.9, 2013, http://unitsofmeasure.org/

OMG UML 2.5.1, Unified Modeling Language. (2017). https://www.omg.org/spec/UML/2.5.1/

W3C: Extensible Mark-up Language (XML) – Version 1.0 (Fifth Edition), August 2008

W3C: XML Schema – Version 1.0 (Second Edition), October 2004

Peter Baumann, Jinsongdi Yu: OGC 12-039, OGC® Web Coverage Service Interface Standard —  Scaling Extension. Open Geospatial Consortium (2014). https://portal.ogc.org/files/?artifact_id=54504

Peter Baumann, Jinsongdi Yu: OGC 12-049, OGC® Web Coverage Service Interface Standard —  Interpolation Extension. Open Geospatial Consortium (2014). https://portal.ogc.org/files/?artifact_id=54502

Peter Baumann, Jinsongdi Yu: OGC 11-053r1, OGC® Web Coverage Service Interface Standard — CRS Extension. Open Geospatial Consortium (2014). https://portal.ogc.org/files/?artifact_id=54209

Peter Trevelyan, Paul Hershberg, Steve Olson: OGC 15-045r7, OGC MetOcean Application profile for WCS2.1: Part 0 MetOcean Metadata. Open Geospatial Consortium (2020)

4.  Terms and definitions

For the purposes of this document, the following terms and definitions apply.

This document uses the terms defined in Sub-clause 5.3 of [OGC 06-121r8], which is based on the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2, Rules for the structure and drafting of International Standards. In particular, the word “shall” (not “must”) is the verb form used to indicate a requirement to be strictly followed to conform to this standard.

This document also uses terms defined in the OGC Standard for Modular specifications (OGC 08-131r3), also known as the ‘ModSpec’. The definitions of terms such as standard, specification, requirement, and conformance test are provided in the ModSpec.

For the purposes of this document, the following additional terms and definitions apply. There is some variation in the specific use of some technical terms within the meteorological domain. We have attempted to follow common usage, referring where possible to the WMO No.306 http://www.wmo.int/pages/prog/www/WMOCodes.

4.1. 

numerical weather prediction model

A numerical weather prediction model is a mathematical model of the atmosphere and oceans used to predict the weather based on current weather conditions and are normally run at set times each day.

Synonyms for numerical weather prediction model: forecast model, NWP Model, simulation

An Example of a numerical weather prediction model: The ECMWF model that runs twice per day and creates a ten day prediction of the global atmosphere.

4.2. 

Time Dimension

A typical numerical model simulation has the property of start and end time of the simulation. Intermediate times within the simulation are times for which the data may be used as estimate of the forecast conditions at that time. The use of time within this document does assume that the “Time Dimension” of the simulation falls within the start and end times of the simulation. The standard ISO 8601 notation is used to describe time.

4.3. 

Web Coverage Service 2.1 (WCS2.1)

Web Coverage Service (WCS) is an OGC standard that refers to the exchange of geospatial information as ‘coverages’: digital geospatial information representing space-varying phenomena.

4.4. 

GetCapabilities operation

The getCapabilities is a WCS operation involving a machine to machine communication. A getCapabilities request to a WCS server returns a list of what operations and services (“capabilities”) are being offered by that server.

4.5. 

DescribeCoverage operation

A DescribeCoverage is a WCS operation involving a machine-to-machine communication. A DescribeCoverage request to a WCS server returns additional information about a coverage that a client wants to query. Generally speaking, a DescribeCoverage response includes information about the CRS, the metadata, the domain, the range and the formats available. A client generally will need to issue a DescribeCoverage request before it can make the proper GetCoverage request.

4.6. 

Polygon

A Polygon, in this document, consist of a plane 2D shape with a depth and time dimension. The polygon may be multi-dimensional, and in the case of aviation is often four dimensions, i.e. x, y, z, t.

4.7. 

GetPolygon operation

GetPolygon is a newly proposed MetOcean operation involving a machine to machine communication. A GetPolygon request to a WCS server returns a polygon coverage based on a trajectory path with a lateral and vertical extent (the polygon).

5.  Conventions

This sections provides details and examples for any conventions used in the document. Examples of conventions are symbols, abbreviations, use of XML schema, or special notes regarding how to read the document.

5.1.  Identifiers

The normative provisions in this standard are denoted by the URI

http://www.opengis.net/spec/{standard}/{m.n}

All requirements and conformance tests that appear in this document are denoted by partial URIs which are relative to this base.

5.2.  Abbreviated terms

GML Geography Mark-up Language

O&M Observations and Measurements

OGC Open Geospatial Consortium

MetOcean Meteorological/Oceanographic

NWP Numerical Weather Prediction

SWE OGC Sensor Web Enablement

UML Unified Modelling Language

WCS2.1 OGC Web Coverage Service version 2.1

WMO World Meteorological Organisation

XML W3C Extensible Markup Language

XSD W3C XML Schema Definition Language

5.3.  Schema language

The XML implementation specified in this Standard is described using the XML Schema language (XSD) [XML Schema Part 1: Structures, XML Schema Part 2: Datatypes] and Schematron [ISO/IEC 19757-3, Information technology — Document Schema Definition Languages (DSDL) — Part 3: Rule-based validation — Schematron].

5.4.  UML notation

The diagrams that appear in this standard are presented using the Unified Modeling Language (UML) static structure diagram.

Note: Within the context of this standard, the following color scheme is used to identify the package in which the class exists. This is just for informative purposes.

Blue: WCS2.1 plus extensions (rsub, scal, int and crs)

Orange: CIS (Coverage Implantation Schema 1.1)

Green: This standard

6.  Vocabularies

This standard defines a number of properties that require the use of codes or vocabulary items. In some cases, a list of terms are provided. The MetOcean Profile, on which this builds, has a specific vocabulary provided by the WMO (World Meteorological Office). These vocabularies are concerned with the naming of parameters (variables) used in the rangeSubset element, the coordinate reference systems (aka fixedSurfacetypeAndUnits) used in the srsName attribute, the units of measure, and the significance of time codes. The following table lists the references used within this document.

Table 1 — Summary of vocabularies within this standard

Code list Code reference
GRIB edition 2 http://codes.wmo.int/_grib2
Discipline http://codes.wmo.int/grib2/codeflag/_0.0
Fixed surface types and units http://codes.wmo.int/grib2/codeflag/_4.5
Parameter category http://codes.wmo.int/grib2/codeflag/_4.1
Parameter number http://codes.wmo.int/grib2/codeflag/_4.2

7.  Non-Normative (Informative) Material

The GetPolygon extension for WCS2.1 is an initiative of the MetOcean DWG to enhance the WCS2.1 core profile to extract coverages other than those extracted using the simple SLICE and TRIM methods provided by the core GetCoverage operation shown in Figure 1. For reference to the core WCS2.1 see OGC® Web Coverage Service 2.1 Interface Standard — Core (OGC 17-089r1). This specific extension is designed specifically to extract polygons from multidimensional cubes such as those created by numerical simulations (i.e. NWP) commonly found in the MetOcean community.

image

Figure 1 — WCS GetCoverage operation UML class diagram

The need for this work arises out of the growing need to transfer increasing amounts of data across networks. This can, and should, be done more efficiently by sub-setting the data. This profile specifies how data contained within a polygon may be extracted on the WCS server and transferred to the client. The document also details how the OGC’s WCS2.1 Core is extended to include an additional GetPolygon operation. Finally, the Coverage Implementation Schema (CIS1.1) is used to describe the vertical and temporal definition of the Polygon.

7.1.  WCS2.1

The WCS2.1 files (see https://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=67116&version=1) that form the core standard and the extensions (see below) describe the GetCapabilities, DescribeCoverage and GetCoverage operations. The GetPolygon extension will use the following extensions to WCS core:

The main benefit of WCS2.1 core to the MetOcean Profile, and specifically the getPolygon operation, is that it allows the description of a CIS1.1 Coverage (see Figure 2). This is important as CIS1.1 supports multi-dimensional coverages and the encoding of coverage types such as polygons.

image

Figure 2 — UML Diagram representing the coverage model (CIS 1.1)

7.2.  A Short NWP (Numerical Weather Prediction) Primer

The term “NWP model” refers to a computer simulation used to forecast the future state of the ocean/atmosphere. A NWP model is normally “run” at a set time and repeated at regular intervals during the day. Each model run has a “Time Dimension” that has “start time”, “end time” and intermediate times. These intermediate times are at set intervals and often referred to as “forecast times”. For each “forecast time”, there will be an estimate of the atmospheric/oceanic conditions for that time. The model start time is a notional time that sets a “base” time for the time intervals. Thus a time interval may have an absolute time e.g. 2017-05-15T00:00:00Z. Or, a time interval may use the start time as reference e.g. PT30H. This signifies a time that is 30 hours ahead of the “start time”.

7.3.  Coverages

A “coverage” contains a “DomainSet” component describing the coverage’s domain (i.e. the locations for which values are stored in the coverage) and a “range­Set” component containing the values of the coverage. A “coverage” also contains a RangeType element that describes the coverage’s range set data structure that consists of one or more fields (also referred to as parameters) that uses the SWE Common [OGC 08-094] Data­Record. The metadata component represents an extensible slot for metadata. The CIS1.1 UML diagram is shown in Figure 2.

7.3.1.  4D Coverages

A typical NWP forecast is normally a set of 2D rectified grids; although more advanced, grids may be used. A typical model run contains literally thousands of 2D grids and each may described using the CIS1.1 “General Grid” coverage model.

These coverages may described and accessed by using the OGC’s Web Coverage Service (WCS). The main services are “GetCapabilities”, “DescribeCoverage” and “GetCoverage”. A problem with this approach is that the metadata returned by the GetCapabilites response and the number of GetCoverage requests quickly becomes unmanageable. By creating a multidimensional coverage from the 2D coverages, the amount of data and number of GetCoverage requests are greatly reduced, often by a factor of 100.

The key to creating a multidimensional coverage is OGC’s CIS1.1 “Coverage” model. This model makes it much easier to describe the “Domain Set” as a multi-dimensional geometry object.

A typical numerical simulation has a number of different vertical coordinates (i.e. pressure, height above mean sea level, height above ground, surface, and max wind level). By forming a 4D coverage from all of the 2D coverages that share the same horizontal, vertical, and temporal domains, there is a significant reduction in number of coverages, thus reducing complexity. This is a challenge, as the vertical and temporal axes are not regular and need to be enumerated. The “GeneralGridCoverage” as described in CIS1.1 makes this possible.

This key concept therefore changes the traditional view of data as being a set of 2D fields; each with a level, level type, parameter name, and forecast period. We can now describe the whole atmosphere as a multidimensional cube with properties, e.g. temperature, wind speed, and humidity. This results in the ability to make multidimensional (4/5/* D) geospatial queries that are much more efficient, for both the WCS2.1 GetCoverage, GetPolygon and GetCorridor operations. It is important to note that there are special cases where the vertical axis has no vertical dependency (e.g. surface, max wind level). It is also possible that some parameters (e.g. temperature) may belong to more than one coverage (e.g. surface, isobaric, etc.)

7.4.  Polygons:

A typical polygonal extraction pattern is show in Figure 3 using a set of points to describe the polygon. A special case of a polygon extraction is to use a circle with a radius and centre point position.